Abstract
Environmental factors and electrical interference pose significant challenges to SPRT accuracy. This article examines thermal anchoring, lead resistance errors, and electromagnetic interference (EMI), offering practical mitigation strategies.
Inadequate thermal contact between the SPRT and the measured medium leads to slow response times and temperature lag.
Solution
Use thermally conductive paste or epoxy to enhance sensor-medium contact.
Select SPRT sheaths with high thermal conductivity (e.g., stainless steel for corrosive environments).
Long lead wires introduce additional resistance, distorting the measured voltage, especially in 2-wire configurations.
Solution
Adopt 3-wire or 4-wire Kelvin connections to nullify lead resistance effects.
Ensure uniform temperature distribution across leads to avoid thermoelectric offsets.
SPRT signals in industrial settings are vulnerable to EMI from motors, transformers, or RF sources, causing signal noise.
Solution
Shield cables with braided copper or aluminum foil and ground the shield at one end.
Use twisted-pair wiring to cancel induced magnetic fields.
Integrate low-pass filters into data acquisition systems to suppress high-frequency noise.
Exposure to oxidizing/reducing atmospheres or humidity can degrade SPRT performance over time.
Solution
Deploy hermetically sealed SPRTs with inert gas (e.g., argon) filling.
For high-humidity environments, use moisture-resistant sheaths (e.g., PTFE-coated).
Conclusion
Environmental robustness and advanced electrical configurations are essential for reliable SPRT operation in demanding conditions.